Putting a shine on a worthless coin

According to our ever reliable media, Davie Cameron has made a pledge to grant Scotland further extra tax powers if we vote no in September.  Only they must be meaning pledge as in “shiny polish in a can” as opposed to “solemn commitment to take a specific action on a definite date and spelling out the consequences on the pledgee if they fail to uphold their word”.

A pledge would have been David Cameron saying “I solemnly swear that if there is a No vote, I will move a bill in the House of Commons on September 19th to grant Scotland full control over welfare, taxation, oil revenues, energy policy, and if I cannot secure passage of the bill I will resign and cycle down Whitehall naked with a pair of Union Jack boxer shorts on my head.”  That’s a pledge.

You can carefully read all the way through the transcript of Davie’s speech without encountering any solemn commitments to increase the powers of the Scottish Parliament in specified ways.   You certainly won’t hear him committing himself to any personal consequences if he goes back on his word to the voters.  We are not being promised Devo-Max, Devo-Plus, or Devo-Didn’t they used to be a band in the 80s.  Which only leaves the shiny polish.

Davie was only saying that the existing system of devolution could work better.  This is just another way of saying it’s not working very well at the moment, something most of us had managed to work out for ourselves already.  He didn’t say how he thought it could work better, nor what steps he was going to take to make it work better.  Even a crappy mechanic who sucks in his breath when looking at a clapped out motor and mutters “och, it’s gaunnie cost ye” provides more in the way of technical information.  Working better seemingly means giving Holyrood more ‘responsibilities’ as opposed to more powers.  Which is Westminster’s way of sooking in its breath and saying “och, it’s gaunnie cost ye.”

It’s a common Tory view that Westminster needs to claw powers back from Holyrood.  Davie may very well have a different interpretation of “working better” from the average punter who wants increased powers for the Scottish Parlie.

And that’s before we ask the thorny question “working better for who?”  Working better for Ian Lang or Michael Forsyth perhaps.  They have Davie’s ear.  Not you or me. Some of us are old enough to remember the former Tory PM Alec Douglas Home promising Scotland “something better” if we voted no in the home rule referendum of 1979.  Margaret Thatcher may very well have been something better for Alec Douglas Home, but she certainly wasn’t for the rest of us.

The extra tax powers referred to in Davie’s speech, which got the Conservative media all excited – and for the purposes of the Scottish debate the Conservative media is pretty much all the newspapers and all the broadcasters – was in fact a reference to the powers over income tax contained in the 2012 Scotland Act and due to be implemented in 2016.  It was not a reference to anything new.

But the Telegraph insisted that Cameron’s “spokesman confirmed later the Prime Minister meant that rejecting separation ‘will mean’ more powers being transferred above and over taxes already being devolved in 2016.”

And that’s it.  There’s a solemn commitment from the UK Government for you.  The word of an anonymous policy wonk that Scotland will get more powers, but they’re still not for saying what these powers might consist of.   This is what we’re given to put our faith in, an unattributable statement from an unelected assistant.  If Davie was going to make a promise that he could later be called to account for, he’d have done so in his speech.

Even Alec Douglas Home had the deceny to betray us in person when he promised Scotland “something better” if we voted no in 1979.  David Bowie at least managed to get another celeb to make his four word intervention in the indy debate.  Cameron gets a nameless hireling to brief the friendly press in private.

It’s not much of a pledge, and it won’t sparkle with a brilliant shine no matter how much you buff it with the torn pages of the Telegraph.  It’s more of the common currency of Westminster’s tarnished lies, not a shiny new promise.  You can polish a worthless coin all you want, you still can’t buy jam with it.

0 thoughts on “Putting a shine on a worthless coin

  1. Pingback: Putting a shine on a worthless coin - Speymouth

  2. Dead right, again. Project Fear are running on empty. All you get from them, whoever the spokesperson is, is the same old regurgitated rubbish, which, if we had any decent M.S.M journalists would be discredited immediately. Personally, I don’t mind the “Day Trippers”, as Blair Jenkins has described them, coming to Scotland every so often, as I feel that with every pronouncement they make, orders that must be obeyed, at least in their minds, they add more votes to the Yes camp. No, my biggest problem is with the so-callled “proud scots”, who take every opportunity to denigrate their own country. I hope come the 18th they get their come -uppence, but unfortunately they will still be around trying to find another gravy train, {public money} to ride on. We must not forget.

  3. Listening to Cameron’s speech was like listening to a used car salesman trying to sell you the ancient rust bucket thats been parked since forever at the back of the car lot.

  4. Having just found out that Ruth Davidson intends to stand for Parliament in an independent Scotland, and that Willie Rennie says that the Yes campaign’s slogan of Scots ruling Scots is a good idea, I rest my case.

  5. I think the nameless lackey had to clarify what Cameron meant by “CAN mean more powers” as opposed to WILL mean more powers. The word “can” can lead to canfusion.

  6. The labour party are worse than the tories will ever be with regards to scaremongering and promising- Well fuck all in reality. The Scottish labour Mafia see their grip of Scottish politics and their good living slipping away. One example of filling their pooches is Gordon Brown £10k per week in non taxable expenses oot of his so called charity .£200.000 in hoose o commons expenses in the last financial year. When the fuck is he in the hoose to claim any expenses?and whit aboot him renting his londonium hoose oot when he was staying in no 10@11 with the tax payer paying for his Londonium hoose. Gordon micht be able to frichten the average punter but no them wi hawf a brain.As Billy Cotton used to say WAKEY, WAKEY

  7. I hope you dont mind but I have posted this article on the guardian where Carrell is saying that cameron ‘will back plans’ to offer more powers when we all know that’s complete nonsense.

  8. Did Cameron not rule out any other offer option on the referendum paper just because he thought that was what ECK was angling for. “You either vote YES or NO” that’s it.

    Now we are being offered other option out of Daves love for F****** jock land.

Leave a Reply to Marian Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.